<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for M.I.A.S. Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of the Miami International Arbitration Society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:45:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting Aside New York Convention Awards by Case of the Day: Costa v. Celebrity Cruises &#171; Letters Blogatory</title>
		<link>http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/2009/06/setting-aside-new-york-convention-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Case of the Day: Costa v. Celebrity Cruises &#171; Letters Blogatory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/?p=69#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] In my view Industrial Risk is wrongly decided. I am not the only blogger to say so: Marc Goldstein made a similar point in 2009, citing several precedents to that effect: The &#8230; holding that a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In my view Industrial Risk is wrongly decided. I am not the only blogger to say so: Marc Goldstein made a similar point in 2009, citing several precedents to that effect: The &#8230; holding that a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in the U.S.: A Primer by Faa Test</title>
		<link>http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/2009/06/enforcement-of-foreign-arbitral-awards-in-the-us-a-primer/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Faa Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/?p=67#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Whether an Arbitration Award obtained in the USA is enforceable in Australia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether an Arbitration Award obtained in the USA is enforceable in Australia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Change? by Marcel Alberge Ribas</title>
		<link>http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/2009/07/real-change/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel Alberge Ribas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/?p=78#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Cheers to that! Brazil could kickoff by joining the investor protection alliance a.k.a. Washington Convention, or by ratifying at least one of the 15 BITs the country signed in the last decade... let&#039;s hope for the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers to that! Brazil could kickoff by joining the investor protection alliance a.k.a. Washington Convention, or by ratifying at least one of the 15 BITs the country signed in the last decade&#8230; let&#8217;s hope for the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting Aside New York Convention Awards by quinnsmith2</title>
		<link>http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/2009/06/setting-aside-new-york-convention-awards/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>quinnsmith2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://miamiinternationalarbitration.com/blog/?p=69#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Excellent post.  How would you describe the difference between vacatur and the denial of recognition?  Do they have different effects on the award?  And as a follow up, should a party be allowed to seek vacatur and gain access to the non-statutory grounds of review instead of having to move to deny recognition and argue only the standards in the New York Convention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.  How would you describe the difference between vacatur and the denial of recognition?  Do they have different effects on the award?  And as a follow up, should a party be allowed to seek vacatur and gain access to the non-statutory grounds of review instead of having to move to deny recognition and argue only the standards in the New York Convention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

